© Idea Sandbox, LLC

Return to the Blog Home

October 26, 2007

Starbucks

Starbucks/Apple iTunes Music Free For All

While visiting Seattle last week, I was able to experience the Starbucks | Apple iTunes Song of the Day promotion. I mentioned this a few weeks ago when blogging about Apple's announcement of the iPod Touch.

To build awareness and trial of the new service allowing free use of Starbucks Wi-Fi to download music from iTunes, Starbucks and Apple are giving away a song a day. Well, actually 1.5 million songs a day - totaling 50 million songs. That's a lotta mp3s! When you visit Starbucks in the current test-markets (Seattle / New York), you receive the "Song of the Day" trading card. As you can see in the image below, cards feature the name of the band and the featured (downloadable) title. The back of the card has a code that activates the download of that specific song.

Additionally, to link and promote the Starbucks Card, partners (Starbucks employees) out-of-store are passing out Starbucks Cards pre-loaded with $5.00... So not only do you get a free latte, but when you register the card on-line you can receive two free downloads. Sweet!


[click for larger image]

A cool feature, within Starbucks, is that iTunes displays the music track that is currently playing in-store. You can see the banner below... While I was in-store Joni Mitchell's "This Place" was playing. If I liked that song, I could click on the title and immediately buy/download it.



[click for larger image]

Starbucks Wi-Fi is typically available only with subscription to T-Mobile. Starbucks/T-Mobile have always targeted business users, many of whom have accounts through their workplace. (A criticism of Starbucks is that they charge for Wi-Fi access when so many other coffee cafes don't. But, Starbucks Wi-Fi isn't targeted to the "starving artist" or entrepreneur).

The Starbucks and Apple marketing teams have done a great job... You can't miss the in-store signage... And if you already have access to iTunes (which several million of us do) more than likely you're going to take advantage of a free song.

Sandboxes

March 13, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems - 5. Loss of Identity

Loss of Identity



This is the 5th in a series of 5 posts where John Moore and I, two former Starbucks marketers, offer recommended changes based upon Howard Schultz's email to the Starbucks leadership team.
I have said for 20 years that our success is not an entitlement and now it’s proving to be a reality. Let’s be smarter about how we are spending our time, money and resources. Let’s get back to the core. Push for innovation and do the things necessary to once again differentiate Starbucks from all others... - Howard's email
The two main concerns Howard expresses are...
  • Get back to the core.
  • Push for innovation.

Stripper & Sandpaper

Starbucks wanting to return to its core, can be likened to restoring antique furniture to its original finish. What you do to an old armoire or dining table is what the Starbucks team should do to preserve the company's original core.
On the left I outline the traditional furniture restoration steps... On the right, I've loosely applied that as a lesson for Starbucks.
Furniture Starbucks
Step 1: REMOVE HARDWARE/STRIP OFF PAINT LAYERS
Remove contemporary knobs, hinges, and pulls recently added to spice up the piece. While nice decoration, they will not match the restored piece. Discard. Use paint stripper, a scraper, and steel wool (for the stubborn spots) to completely remove the layers of old paint. Remove the decorative items that aren't really adding to the experience. These will not match the look of the core. Discard. Strip off the added programs and products that - while pretty - prevent the core from showing. Easier said than done... this will require patience and "steel wool" on the stubborn spots.
Step 2: SAND THE WOOD/FILL IN THE GRAIN
Smooth out any damaged or rough places left in the wood. Spots where damage, over time, has penetrated the surface and into the wood. You may find gaps in the grain. These need to be filled with grain filler to achieve a smooth even finish. Apply filler and remove excess with scraper and sand paper. Of course there will be some rough spots that need smoothing. You will notice that there are gaps exposed that the paint hid. Fill these properly for that smooth finish you're looking for. The attention to detail here - before adding the protective finishes will make a world of difference.
Step 3: APPLY STAIN/FINAL FINISH
Apply thin coats of finish to the piece. Layer on a protective coat to protect it from dirt Ah. Now that we're down to where we want to be - let's preserve the core finish. Intensify and highlight the grain - the markings of your core. Choose a durable finish - one that can handle daily wear and tear.
Final Step: ADMIRE/MAINTAIN/RESPECT
Admire your results. Put someone in charge of maintaining the piece on a regular basis. Create rules that prevent the beauty of the piece from once again being covered over with gaudy colors. Protect from too much heat and chemicals. Use coasters to prevent staining.

Less Innovation, More Exploration

It is easy to argue that strawberry and banana flavored blender beverages are far away from the core offerings of a coffee and tea expert... Even as alternatives for those who don't like the taste of coffee. Driven by the continued need to increase sales, it's a major challenge for the beverage team to maintain the investor-driven mission of constantly developing new beverages.

But Starbucks isn't really in the beverage innovation business. Starbucks didn't invent coffee, or espresso, or the latte. Starbucks is actually in the beverage discovery/distribution business. They didn't invent iced, sweetened, coffee blended with milk - they discovered someone else with this delicious cold drink and created the Frappuccino. They made this recipe available large-scale. They didn't invent Chai tea, but prior to Starbucks offering their version, you'd have to search for high-and-low for a place that served it. Now Chai is standard in cafes throughout North America.

Starbucks problem is not the lack of innovation or imagination, it's lack of exploration. Every culture and country big and small has their own recipes. (e.g. Cuban, Mexican, Caribbean, Viennese, Greek, Turkish, and even ol' American Cowboy coffee).

Starbucks, do what you do best and continue to search the world for exotic coffee, tea, and related beverages recipes. Uncover exotic concoctions and share them with the world. Be who you really are... Explorers and discoverers.

First Things First...

Howard is smart for raising challenges and asking tough questions. What should they do first? I recommend they clearly define "who they are" and "who they want to be."

Do and Do Not
[clip and use in boardroom]

  1. Gather together the company "deciders."
  2. Fold a clean piece of paper in half. On one half of the fold write atop the page "what we DO want to be" on the other half, write "what we DO NOT want to be."
  3. Create ideas for both columns and continue on as many pieces of paper it takes to exhaust your ideas... and then do some more.
  4. Review the "what we DO want to be" list and move some of those ideas to the other side... You won't be able to be ALL of those things.
  5. Use these lists to examine everything you are currently doing, and planning to do. If your ideas are supported by the "What we DO want to be" column - go for it. If the project, program, or idea hints of something in the "what we DO NOT want to be" column... Run away!

While this closes my recommendations for Howard's five key topics, I've got a few more ideas inspired by these posts... But for now, check out John's smart thoughts on Solving Starbucks Problems: Lack of Identity.

Solving Starbucks Problems Series Summary

Sandboxes

March 12, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems - 4. Lack of Merchandise Focus



This is the 4th in a series of 5 posts where John Moore and I, two former Starbucks marketers, offer recommended changes based upon Howard Schultz's email to his leadership team.


"The merchandise, more art than science, is far removed from being the merchant that I believe we can be and certainly at a minimum should support the foundation of our coffee heritage. Some stores don't have coffee grinders, French presses from Bodum, or even coffee filters." - Howard's email
John does a thorough job taking us through a quick history lesson of how Starbucks has spun away from core coffee-related products.

John offers a Decision Making Guidelines for Starbucks to follow... IF/THEN statements to guide their decision making.

I would like to expand one of his guidelines, and offer an additional one.

To John's first guideline...

"Does this product link directly to coffee? If yes, sell it. If no, don’t."
I would like to modify this to read...
"Does this product link directly to the...
  1. ...preparation of coffee? (60% priority) and/or
  2. ...consumption of coffee? (30% priority) and/or
  3. ...the enjoyment of 'in-store Starbucks' at home? (10% priority)
If yes, consider it. If not, don’t."
I made this guideline more strict by limiting it to the preparation/consumption of coffee. In the past the selling of books, stationary, and staplers was considered "okay" because these are all things you could do while sipping a cup of coffee. I'm sure there are plenty of things we could imagine doing with a cuppa joe in-hand that aren't appropriate in Starbucks.

I've added a priority scale... Starbucks should spend more time working on ways for me to make a great cup of coffee at home (60% of their energy) versus creating things to make my home more like Starbucks (10% of their energy).

I also made this filter a little broader by adding... "the enjoyment of in-store Starbucks at home." The Starbucks music compilations are terrific. The team has created uncommonly good compilations of great music tracks. (This does not include the Top-40 CDs Starbucks sells that can be also purchased at any music store. These are common. If you want to be remarkable, only offer the uncommon).

An additional guideline I'd like to add is...

"Is this truly making the world a better place?"
Starbucks should be allowed the exception to sell just about anything if they are using the power of the number of locations, number of employees, and number of customers for good... to make the community or world a better place.

John mentions rumors that Starbucks may be creating a new music label called Starbucks Records. Using these guidelines, unless the full proceeds from the sales of Starbucks Records are donated to help charity... Starbucks may be undertaking an effort that: may dilute the brand, is not differentiating them from other record labels, and moves in an opposite direction the core.

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Sandboxes

March 9, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems - 3. Loss of Store Soul



John Moore and I, two former Starbucks marketers, are offering recommendations to Starbucks in response to chairman Howard Schultz’s recent email.

We are examining his third challenge to the team: Loss of Store Soul

"Clearly we have had to streamline store design to gain efficiencies of scale...However, one of the results has been stores that no longer have the soul of the past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the warm feeling of a neighborhood store. Some people even call our stores sterile, cookie cutter, no longer reflecting the passion our partners feel about our coffee." - Howard Schultz email

Howard expresses concern about stores looking like chain stores and being cookie cutter.

Even Snowflakes Look Alike from a Distance

While there are things Starbucks can do to reduce the cookie-cutter feel, it is a challenge to have 15,000 of anything and not have them look begin to look alike.

I've come up with three key ideas to help solve this challenge...

  • What's Mom n' Pop Got that Starbucks Has Not? - What's the opposite of a chain store? A Mom n' Pop cafe. Let's suggest changes based on the Mom 'n Pop experience.
  • Stop Being All Things, to All People, at All Stores - Starbucks cafes look very similar because, well... they are. What we can we do re-create the destination Starbucks once was.
  • Chain, Chain, Change - If Starbucks doesn't like the stigma of the label "chain store" - change the association...

What's Mom n' Pop Got that Starbucks Has Not?

If I were working this problem with a client, I would have had each participant do pre-work: Visit a local, quality Mom n' Pop coffee shop and jot down observations regarding the experience.

The list would read something like this...

  • Friendly staff, one of them was the owner.
  • Nice, but not overly fancy design in the cafe.
  • Artwork featured local artists and/or coffee inspired images. (My local cafe has black and white pictures of celebrities from the 40s and 50s drinking espresso and coffee).
  • Fixtures were old furniture with character vs. "form follows function" equipment. (Condiment bar was an old dresser.)
  • Our beverages were prepared one at a time. They filled the milk pitcher with just enough milk to steam one drink at once.
  • They made "latte art" when they poured the milk and foam into my latte.
  • They gave me a small cookie as a garnish with my drink.
  • The owner brings in fresh flowers each day from the corner florist.
  • They ran out of the fresh baked banana bread. Evidently, you have to get there early to get a piece. (Customers find this a charm of the cafe - like a fresh farmer's market - the best stuff goes fast and lasts as long as it lasts).
  • More than five people in line 'slammed' the barista, people walked half way in, and left.

It's interesting what customers consider quirky at a single location translates to annoyance if you have more than one location. When you open more than ONE of a business with the same name on it - whether it is a copy center, dry cleaner, or coffee shop - customers begin to expect consistency.

Using our list as inspiration, below are a couple of ways Starbucks may crumble the cookie-cutter look and feel.

  • Mixed Matched Furniture - Mass-producing condiment stations (the place where you add milk, sugar, etc) with a built in trash-hole and spaces to hold three types of sugar, stir stick and napkins is very practical. Nevertheless, it's a piece of industrial furniture.
  • Plants and Fresh Flowers - Nearly every Mom and Pop has plant life. Fresh cut flowers in a vase near the cash register or green potted plants dotted through the cafe. Agreed, overgrown plants strung from beaded macramé hangers are not what I have in mind. However, there are clean, tasteful ways to execute this.
  • More Local Artwork - Rely less on standardized company murals and feature local artists work instead. Some Starbucks locations do display local art - let's make this the rule not the exception. Connect Starbucks with the local art community and everyone benefits.
  • Eliminate Promotional Posters - There are no small or Mom and Pop cafes which post mass-produced product messaging. Occasionally you will find promotional materials provided by the coffee vendor or a specialty bottled drink.
  • As a former Starbucks marketer who used to be in charge of creating the promotional signage and materials found in-store, I know I've just committed Starbucks heresy. But what I also know is that study after study at Starbucks demonstrated that the in-store posters do not drive trial and excitement the way the marketing and product teams hope. The signage is more effective at feeding the ego and comforting the product manager than it actually is at driving sales. (Who doesn't ponder the effectiveness of the NEW Frappuccino flavor promoted above the urinals or in the ladies restroom?)

    Now we have four good reasons to stop creating posters...

    1. They don't drive meaningful trial and awareness.
    2. They're expensive to produce for something that's ineffective.
    3. Reduce use of paper.
    4. They contribute to the cookie cutter look of the stores.

    Replace the promotional posters and their frames with more local artwork.

What else could Starbucks consider?

Stop Being All Things, to All People, at All Stores

While Starbucks stores vary somewhat in merchandise offerings and architectural layout based on volume of store traffic (high/low), location (downtown/suburban), and the physical shape of the store space - to the average customer one Starbucks cafe is pretty much like the next.

In the beginning, Starbucks used to be a place you would have to seek out. A place you wanted to get to - a destination. With so many locations - especially in big cities - one cafe is as good as the next. Let's make the common uncommon by creating Destination Flagship locations. These locations serve as monotony breakers for customers as well as offer Starbucks the chance to re-express their coffee leadership and expertise.

  • Flagship: Whole Bean - THE destination for whole bean expertise
    Features: Expanded whole bean offerings. Exotic coffees while supplies last. Connection with coffee farmers and coffee growing regions. Baristas, who really know, can explain, and demystify coffee. In-store roasting. In-store coffee blending. Regular tasting seminars. Food pairing seminars.

  • Flagship: Brewing - THE destination for at-home brewing expertise.
    Features: Expanded selection of at-home brewing equipment - ranging from simple press-pot, practical coffee maker, to elaborate 'Starbucks in your home' installations. Continuous brewing machine demonstrations. Brew the Best Cup at-home classes.

It's a problem to try to have every Starbucks partner know everything about everything. Flagship locations allow baristas to be certified experts in everything whole bean related and brewing equipment related.

Chain, Chain, Change

While there are still...
  • ...towns that host a parade when they get their first Starbucks,
  • ...happy travelers pleased to find Starbucks abroad,
  • ...double-tall non-fat latte lovers happy to have a store built closer to home or work...
There is a share of people who are "over" Starbucks. What's the big deal? In some major cities, Starbucks literally is on every corner.

Let's make it a big deal!

Starbucks is a chain store. No doubt about it. Moreover, Starbucks plans to get bigger. How can Starbucks use their size for good versus "evil?"

Leverage ubiquity.

Starbucks has the size and wherewithal to change the role and impact of chain stores... Starbucks can redefine what quantity represents beyond convenience.

A dream of mine, while at Starbucks, was to build a program where ALL stores would unite efforts in achieving a common community goal. In the same way a new traffic light on a busy street means a safer intersection... A new Starbucks on our block means a better neighborhood and world. In addition to offering a great cup of coffee and a comfy in-store experience, Starbucks, the good neighbor with "big connections," would help repair what ails our communities.
For example...

  • The homeless will now have the help they need.
  • There will be fewer illiterate children.
  • Teens have better options than drugs or gangs.
  • Another coffee farming town has a new school.
  • Another 100 acres of rain forest are now preserved.
Perhaps those examples are unrealistic, or not the exact problems needing solutions, but I'm certain with focus Starbucks could use size to re-define what "big chain store" means and literally make the world a better place.

Onward...

What are your thoughts? John will continue this conversation at Brand Autopsy. Share your reactions here; share your reactions there.
Extra Credit Activity: Brief History of Starbucks In-Store Design

Starbucks Pre-Soul
Do you remember, in the late-80s and early 90s, when Starbucks was expanding out of Seattle to Chicago, Vancouver BC, Portland, and LA? There was no such thing as "The Third Place."

Stores had tall wooden tables and tall stools. Along the windows were stand-up counters. This design was inspired by what Howard experience in Italy and wanted to bring to America, a re-creation of the Italian espresso bar experience. The original idea was to provide "quick, stand-up, to-go service in downtown office locations."

Back then, stores purposely looked identical to each other. Howard wanted new stores to reflect the warmth and feeling of the original Seattle locations. However, as the number of stores increased from 116 in '92 to 425 locations in '94, this single design seemed too cookie-cutter.

Too Much Soul
In the mid-90s the idea of the "Third Place" began to form. Howard describes the Third Place in his book "Pour Your Heart into It: How Starbucks Built a Company One Cup at a Time" as "a comfortable, social gathering spot away from home and work, like an extension of the front porch." Stores were furnished with fireplaces, couches, and "comfy chairs." However, store development costs were getting out of hand. With plans to more than double store counts in the short-term, and continued aggressive growth in the future, there needed to be a better approach... better design.

Rubber Soul
In '95 the internal design team addressed the challenge of raising store design to a level beyond the competition, at the same time capturing the essence of the Starbucks experience. This team ended up creating four different sets of design formats. These would provide much more flexibility and design variety from store to store. The details of these design elements was bound in a thick, oversized book. It had an artsy cover and back made of thick rubber - and became known as "The Rubber Book." It contained the visual vocabulary and all the icons, images, textures, and elements designed to tell the Starbucks story. A piece any designer would love to pour through and would surely drool over. In addition, purchase costs were reduced through planning and bulk-ordering of custom in-store fixtures (tables, seating, blown lamp shades, counter elements). They successfully created design elements, furniture, and fixtures competition couldn't afford to replicate.

Since early 2000, the in-store design pendulum has swung back and forth... From too visually cluttered, too dark, too expensive, and to Howard's recent comments about streamlining and efficiencies again contributing to a cookie cutter feel.

Sandboxes

March 7, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems - 2. Loss of Coffee Aroma



John Moore and I, two former Starbucks marketers, are offering recommendations to Starbucks in response to chairman Howard Schultz’s recent email.

We are examining the second challenge to the team: Loss of Coffee Aroma

“I believe we overlooked the cause and the affect of flavor lock in our stores. We achieved fresh roasted bagged coffee, but at what cost? The loss of aroma -- perhaps the most powerful non-verbal signal we had in our stores; the loss of our people scooping fresh coffee from the bins and grinding it fresh in front of the customer, and once again stripping the store of tradition and our heritage?” - Howard Schultz email

John began this topic at Brand Autopsy. Below are my reactions to his thoughts, and my additional ideas...

I agree with John that the elimination of daily handling, scooping, grinding, and brewing of coffee - replaced by automatic machines and packaged pre-ground coffee is the key to Starbucks missing aroma problem. Starbucks has allowed efficiency measures to trump handcrafting. Handcrafting exposes us to the activities, sights and smells of the coffee making process - that is theatre (we discuss theatre here and here). Factory efficiency techniques thwart handcrafting.

The Dairy Air Stinks
The loss of coffee aroma is a double-whammy for Starbucks... With the warm, welcoming smell of fresh-ground coffee gone, the replacement is the smell of over-steamed, burnt milk. As a restaurateur, it's disappointing to have a good smell disappear, but even worse to have an unappetizing smell replace it.

FlavorLock Not Exonerated
While I agree with John that FlavorLock packaging is not the single cause of the loss of in-store coffee aroma, I do think FlavorLock shares some blame.

Before FlavorLock, store partners used to open large bags of freshly roasted coffee... One pound at a time, they would measure and scoop into paper bags. This is how whole bean was sold for customer at-home brewing. All this bean handling, pouring, measuring and scooping introduced a lot of aroma to the store. Finally, any product that didn't sell within seven days was ground up and donated. (Yet another chance for scent to waft through the store).

FlavorLock as replacement for hand scooping has reduced coffee aroma.

Whole bean coffee used to be treasured as an exotic agricultural product obtained from around the world. This coffee was special. It was custom-roasted by Starbucks and delivered to stores to be handled daily with care. Even before they were ground, the shiny beans released terrific aroma. Each day coffee was hand-scooped, and custom ground. With the introduction of FlavorLock packaging, handling with care became unnecessary. To partners whole bean coffee became a canned good - a commodity. Partners now simply lug a case of X from the storeroom and replace the three missing packages on the merchandise shelf.

Its no wonder baristas have lost passion for coffee. Who gets excited about a canned good?

Hold the Pastrami, Smell the Coffee
Howard has stated many times over the years, and VERY clearly in his 1997 book, "Pour Your Heart Into It" his philosophy on coffee aroma...

What's the first thing you notice when you approach a Starbucks store? Almost always, it's the aroma. Even non-coffee drinkers love the smell of brewing coffee. It's heady, rich, full-bodied, dark, suggestive. Aroma triggers memories more strong than any of the other senses, and it obviously plays a major role in attracting people to our stores.

Keeping that coffee aroma pure is no easy task. Because coffee beans have a bad tendency to absorb odors, we banned smoking in our stores years before it became a national trend. We ask our partners to refrain from using perfume and cologne. We won't sell chemically flavored coffee beans. We won't sell soup, sliced pastrami, or cooked food. We want you to smell coffee only.

Well, never say never. To "drive incremental sales during the morning daypart," Starbucks has been cooking food. In a limited number of test markets, Starbucks has been using small high-speed ovens to heat sandwiches and pastries. This is allowing Starbucks to capture additional sales from customers who have been buying their coffee at Starbucks, but breakfast somewhere else.

While I admit there is nothing tastier than the Starbucks molasses cookie heated and served warmed... The offending smells of cooked egg and burnt cheese overpower any chance of coffee aroma, just as Howard feared.

So, what solutions will bring back coffee aroma?

A seemingly simple answer...
Why doesn't Starbucks just do what all of the other scent-filled, gourmet coffee places do? Merchandise coffee in barrels, with big scoops!? The place will fill with coffee smell.

Ironically, what we perceive as the fresh, gourmet, and authentic way to display coffee is the absolute worst thing you could do to coffee. Exposure to light and air causes coffee go stale and quickly destroys quality and flavor.

While the coffee displays at places like Zabars in NYC look like an old world market - scooping from an open-air barrel is actually the worst way to buy coffee.

Therefore, what ARE solutions?

  • Fresh Grind Thru the Day for In-Store Brewing - I can confirm first-hand that John's suggestion of having stores re-instate the practice of fresh-grinding coffee for brewing will in itself return coffee aroma.

    While traveling to Vienna, Austria a few weeks ago, I stopped into Starbucks for my latte. There was something about the store visit that was different from the norm... yet familiar. Then I realized - I smell coffee! It was like the old days at Starbucks. Why do I smell coffee in European Starbucks, but not in the US? European Starbucks locations are NOT brewing coffee using the tear-open bags of factory packaged, pre-ground and, pre-measured coffee. They grind small, fresh batches - all through the day - filling the store with great coffee aroma.

  • Create and Strictly Follow an "Aroma First" Rule - Since coffee is Starbucks core, and scent is the strongest cue for our senses - make aroma the highest priority. (Yes, even more important than perceived increased sales). Maintain Howard's original desire to preserve aroma and implement an "Aroma First" rule. It's simple, for every decision; ask, "Is this going to negatively affect aroma in any way?" If the answer is "yes" do not do it...

    Let's use the "Aroma First" rule to review previous decisions and some new ideas...

    Project Affect on Aroma Implement?
    Provide pre-ground coffee instead of in-store grinding. Negative. Eliminates chance for smell. No. Do not.
    Heat foods in-store. Negative. Introduces conflicting smells. No. Do not.
    Use FlavorLock pre-packaged beans. Negative. This eliminates hand scooping. Hand scooping adds coffee aroma to stores. No. Do not. Use these in the grocery channel and at airport locations where scent is not critical.
    Install mini coffee roasters in select stores. Positive. If roasted properly will increase the coffee aroma. Yes, explore this idea. If they can do it in-store at Whole Foods Market, Costco Warehouses, and the two-location Atomic Cafe, Starbucks could consider it.
    Use barrels of coffee to merchandise coffee. Positive. Will enhance aroma. Yes, explore this idea. But this coffee is for display (and aroma) only and cannot be brewed.

    The Aroma First tool provides a guide to fix old problems, and prevent new ones.

What practical ideas do you have? Add your reactions! Let us know your thoughts.



Our next topic, Solving Starbucks Problems: Loss of Store Soul, will address Howard's concern that stores have become too chain store like. I will begin the conversation here at Idea Sandbox, and John will follow-up with his thoughts at Brand Autopsy.


Solving Starbucks Problems: One Post at a Time
Where we've been...
Where we're going...
  • Issue 3: Loss of Store Soul
  • Issue 4: Lack of Merchandise Focus
  • Issue 5: Loss of Differentiation

Sandboxes

March 6, 2007

Starbucks

Starbucks Ranks #2, Fortune's Most Admired Companies of 2007

For 25 years Fortune Magazine has been ranking the top 20 American companies. This year, 2007, Starbucks ranked #2 for all industries, and #1 in the Food Service industry. General Electric tops them all off at #1. They are followed by Toyota (3), insurance company Berkshire Hathaway (4), and Southwest Airlines (5).

Among the eight attributes of reputation used for ranking, Starbucks scored the highest score (#1) in...

  • Innovation,
  • People Management,
  • Use of Corporate Assets,
  • Quality of Management, and
  • Quality of Products/Services

They are ranked #2 in the areas of...

  • Social Responsibility,
  • Financial Soundness, and
  • Long-Term Investment

States Fortune online...

For years now Starbucks has paid fair-market prices to Third World coffee farmers and helped develop ecologically sound growing practices. Starbucks is also a regular on FORTUNE's annual list of the 100 Best Companies to Work For. It's green, it's humane, it's politically correct, it sells a popular product and provides a comfy place to hang out and consume same - what's not to like?

Sandboxes

March 5, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems - 1. Loss of Theatre



On February 23 an e-mail, from Starbucks Coffee chairman Howard Schultz to his senior leadership team, was leaked and posted on the internet. In the note Howard outlined key issues leading to possible "commoditization of the Starbucks brand."

This is the first in a series of posts where johnmoore and I, former Starbucks marketers, offer our recommendations to the Starbucks leadership team. Recommendations specifically designed to help Starbucks..."get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks experience."

Here is a portion of Howard's email where he states his first challenge to the team... Loss of Theatre.

When we went to automatic espresso machines, we solved a major problem in terms of speed of service and efficiency. At the same time, we overlooked the fact that we would remove much of the romance and theatre that was in play with the use of the La Marzocco* machines. This specific decision became even more damaging when the height of the machines, which are now in thousands of stores, blocked the visual sight line the customer previously had to watch the drink being made, and for the intimate experience with the barista. - Howard Schultz eMail

*La Marzocco is a brand of manually operated espresso machine

Issue 1: Loss of Theatre

The loss of "romance and theatre" due to automated machines has created two challenges:
  1. The machines have created a physical barrier between the barista and the customer.
  2. Automatic functions have replaced barista hand-crafting, knowledge, and expertise.

Before I jump into solutions, let's look at the benefits added and problems caused by automated machines at Starbucks...

Automation: Pros/Cons

PRO: Problems Solved:
  • Drinks are more consistent from store to store.
  • Less chance for barista error - no longer do baristas have to manage the proper grind, dose of coffee, proper tamping, and timing.
  • Less "bad shots" pulled due to poor calibration of manual machines. This means
    • drinks can be made faster enhancing speed of service, and
    • less product waste, which reduces food cost for Starbucks.
  • Barista can multi-task. Instead of monitoring the shot, the barista can be steaming milk or prepping the next drink while the machine dispenses the perfect shot.

CON: Problems Created:

  • Beverages seem less hand-crafted. More mechanical, less personal.
  • Current automated machines block sight-line between customer and barista.
  • Expertise no longer required. Baristas rely on machine and skills become lazy. Shots poured directly into paper cup. (No more looking at shots, assumption they taste good).

Recommendations

  • Go Semi-Automatic - If fully-automated is too automated, put some manual back. Keep some automation by having the grind, dose, and tamp performed on an automated grinder, but let the barista use a manual espresso machine. (See Good Shot, Bad Shot below for more background on jargon and details).
  • Differentiate Stores - At this stage for Starbucks, it's very impractical in high-volume city stores to completely eliminate automation. The wait times to have your beverage made would put Starbucks out of business. (Think about how often you've seen a line 5, 10 or 15 people deep, but stuck with it because you knew you'd get through quickly). Target these stores only for automation. The suburban and lower volume stores could stay manual. Be sure to rotate partners (employees) between stores with manual machines so all partners retain their craft at pulling espresso shots.
  • Manual Prioritization - Most stores use more than one espresso machine. Install an automatic and a manual machine. Make the manual the primary machine, and use the automatic only during high-volume parts of the day.
  • Eliminate Visual Barrier - Reposition the espresso machines and barista so the customer can see the barista and the beverage crafting. I know this is something that Starbucks has been working on... both a better layout for new stores, and a way to fix existing stores. Make this a top priority.
  • Design Low-Profile Machines - To test automation, Starbucks initially purchased off-the-shelf machines. These are obviously constructed taller than Starbucks would spec if they built their own. In fact, Starbucks had been testing lower profile machines for more than 18-months... I assume these slick, retro-looking, lower profile machines must not have delivered what they hoped or Starbucks would have started to use these to fix the sightline problem Howard mentions.
  • Re-Train "Unnecessary" Knowledge - Like learning, but not using a foreign language, with automated machines most baristas have no need to use their "good shot/bad shot" training (See below). They lose their espresso skills. Re-train this knowledge and make sure baristas have a chance to exercise it.

Good Shot, Bad Shot (Background)

While our first reaction may be... "It's just coffee. What's the big deal!?" ...It really isn't simple to make a great espresso-based beverages. The secret is in the espresso shot. This has been a frustration for many customers who buy at-home machines, and the accouterments, but still can't get it to taste like the way the coffee shop makes it.

Key steps to manually "pulling shots" of espresso used in Starbucks beverages are generally as follows. (You'll see why automating makes such great sense).

There are two key pieces of equipment... the grinder and the espresso machine.

First: Start at Grinder

  1. Grind coffee to proper grind (size).
  2. Put proper measure (dose) of ground coffee in portafilter (the small metal handle that gets wrenched onto the espresso machine).
  3. Tamp (press down) with proper pressure on the ground coffee in the portafilter.
Next: Espresso Machine
  1. Pull shot for the right amount of time (Starbucks has guideline range of 18 to 23 seconds). This means that the 2 ounces of water pressurized by the espresso machine takes 18 to 23 seconds to flow through the finely ground coffee.
  2. Visually inspect espresso shot in shot glass for indication of quality - distinctive three layers - heart, body and crema.
  3. Rinse portafilter under hot water, ready for next espresso shot.

GOOD SHOT - If the shot takes 18 to 23 seconds and looks good, it's okay to use in a beverage.

BAD SHOT - If it comes out too quickly or too slowly, it means that something isn't correct, it would taste awful, so you need to pull another shot.


    To correct, the barista needs to determine if one, a combination, or all of these is wrong... wrong grind, wrong dose, wrong tamp, wrong timing.

    A skilled barista can probably make a single adjustment to compensate and get the next shot just right. At times, however it may take 3, 4 or 5 trials to get the shot perfect. Quality is the key.


The automated machines Starbucks uses combines to grinder and espresso machine into one. It grinds, measures/doses, tamps, pulls, times, and cleans automatically. (Even programmed to pull for the right amount of time to taste like a shot pulled from the manual "La Marzocco" machine).

Manual machines and grinders need to be calibrated multiple times each day - affected by temperature, humidity, and oiliness of the coffee beans.

Making Sense of an Espresso Shot

Sight - A properly prepared espresso shot produces three distinct layers in a shot glass - heart (bottom), body (middle), and crema (top). Akin to the way an experienced bartender can "see" if a beer is too warm/cold or flat by the way the head forms on the beer, the barista can immediately "see" if a shot will taste good our not in your drink.

Taste - Taste buds tell no tales. No matter what type of drink you order, from straight espresso to something elaborate with milk, syrup, and toppings, if the espresso shot tastes poor the entire drink will taste poor.

One Post at a Time...

John continues this conversation at Brand Autopsy. Share your reactions here, share your reactions there.
Sandboxes

March 2, 2007

Starbucks

Solving Starbucks Problems: One Post at a Time



Last week an e-mail, from Starbucks Coffee chairman Howard Schultz to his senior leadership team, was leaked and posted on the internet. In the note Howard outlines to his senior leadership team key issues leading to "commoditization of the brand."

Howard's Concerns

"It's time to get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks experience."
Howard identifies five issues, they are:
  1. Loss of Theatre
  2. Loss of Coffee Aroma
  3. Loss of Store Soul
  4. Lack of Merchandise Focus
  5. Loss of Identity (Differentiation)

Starbucks Leadership Team +2

John Moore (with Brand Autopsy) and I have over 19 years combined experience as former marketers with Starbucks. The company has provided us with incredible experience and expertise. We are compelled to give something back.

In a series of posts, John and I will offer suggestions to Howard and his team. We will ping-pong between our two sites - Brand Autopsy and Idea Sandbox - offering our opinions, recommendations, and looking for your reactions.

John kicks us off with an introduction on Sunday, March 4th and I offer our first set of solutions one post at at time on Monday morning.

Sandboxes

December 20, 2006

Starbucks

Starbucks Speaks on YouTube

Take a look at this two-minute video featuring Dub Hay - the head of Starbucks coffee team - talking briefly about Starbucks coffee purchasing practices...

This is in response, among other things, to the recent trademark issues in Ethiopia.

Long story short...

The government of Ethiopia wants to trademark the names of their key coffees. To use those names will require paying the government a royalty. There was protest from the coffee industry. Oxfam made the claim that Starbucks was trying to block the trademarking. Camera crews pull up and report on Starbucks' poor conduct and Starbucks was reflected in the media as trying to hurt African farmers.

Truth is...
The National Coffee Association is actually the group that spoke out against the trademarking move (not Starbucks). Starbucks IS against it, but because they are afraid it would hurt the coffee farmers economically by pricing them out of the market. (So the African government would benefit - not the farmer).

Starbucks is big and easy to get to with street-side locations... it makes an easy target. Oxfam wanted to gain media coverage about the trademark issue... so you get a camera crew outside of a London Starbucks location. If I wanted to protest against the coffee purchasing practices of Maxwell House or wanted to picket the National Coffee Association... where would I stand? The grocery aisle in front of the cans of Folgers?

While working at Starbucks, I was always frustrated that we didn't tell OUR side of the story. We weren't bad guys. We just didn't believe in engaging in these mud-slinging conversations. So, without our own voice in the conversation... people assumed Starbucks had something to hide... (or else we would have defended ourselves...)

But that's not the history of Starbucks...

Let me give you two examples...

Starbucks and Community Give Back

Did you know that nearly every single Starbucks location that opens has a charity partner that the store employees work with and help support? Sometimes it's a cash donation, donation of food to a soup kitchen, or employees (called partners) volunteering time to help the charity... there is always a local connection.

When I first started working at Starbucks in '96 we not allowed to talk about these partnerships.

Why?

Because company leaders, Howard Schultz and Howard Behar, felt it was considered boastful and rude. We weren't doing it for a publicity stunt or for PR. Starbucks does it because it is the right way to be a neighbor within the community. So calling the TV cameras was considered exploiting the local relationship we were building... that breaks the trust between you and the local charity folks.

My dream as a field marketing person was that people would be so aware of the good things that Starbucks does that, instead of it being a joke that "another store opened up down the street," that the presence of another store would elicit the response "oh good - another Starbucks... that means great coffee AND [pick one] (more support for AIDS education / more help getting disadvantaged kids to read / more help for the soup kitchen / more help for the local charity)...

No Bad-Mouthing

I also remember one story of how Starbucks took their business away from a well-established local bakery and the woman ended up closing her bakery and going out of business. The story pitched Starbucks as being an insensitive local business crusher that went with a bigger bakery and put the little guy out of business.

What Starbucks didn't share was that the woman was repeatedly failing health code inspections. Starbucks tried to work with her to get her bakery cleaned up, but she didn't get herself back up to code. Starbucks said, if you can't keep up to the city codes and OUR codes - we can't use you... Finally they had to withdraw doing business with her.

So Starbucks took a media-beating versus calling this woman and her business dirty. (It would have been VERY easy to be honest with the media - but there was no need to bad-mouth this person).

And with regard to the coffee discussion from above... Starbucks should never have caved to the pressure of the Fair Trade activists... Instead should have talked about how Starbucks' purchasing methods are actually BETTER (and always have been) than what Fair Trade offers...

Fairest Trade Coffee

Starbucks pays more for coffee directly to the farmers they work with than what Fair Trade prices command.

Fair Trade is all about making sure the coffee farmer doesn't get taken advantage of by brokers or their governments.

But Starbucks pays MORE than Fair Trade prices.

Instead of Starbucks ever offering Fair Trade coffee in the first place, they should have said...

"No. Our coffee is Fair-er... or Fair-est Trade Coffee. We pay more than the Fair Trade price directly to the farmer. In fact, if we DO offer Fair Trade the farmer makes LESS money that Starbucks already offers!"

And... by the way, Fair Trade isn't necessarily good or quality coffee. Fair Trade isn't a quality inspection - it's a payment structure certification.

Through farming techniques and land management advice Starbucks helps farmers grow better quality coffee so they can be more competitive locally. (And get more coffee companies to buy their crops).

In closing...

So while Starbucks hasn't spoken out it in the past... And while it's not a perfect company... they try to do the right thing all the time. And if they make an honest mistake, they try their best to correct it...

Perhaps this YouTube video is the beginning of Starbucks telling their side of the story.

Sandboxes

November 10, 2006

Starbucks

"It's Red Again" - Starbucks Christmas Website

The holiday promotion has launched at Starbucks... marked with a coordinated effort...

  • the ringing of the market bell on Wall St.,
  • in NYC, baristas handing out more than 8,000 “acts of cheer” from complimentary subway MetroCards, free New York Times, bags of Starbucks Christmas Blend coffee, and $5 Starbucks Cards. Each surprise accompanied by a Cheer Pass and a taste of the holiday beverages."...
  • they've decked the halls of the main Starbucks site (starbucks.com)...

  • ...as well as launched ItsRedAgain.com - their official Christmastime website.


[click for a much larger image]

Perhaps you remember me talking about TheRedCup.com last year [1], [2], and [3]. It's a big deal for partners (employees at Starbucks) as well as customers when the 'red cup' arrives. It's signals that the holiday season has officially started and the return of holiday beverages: eggnog, gingerbread, and peppermint lattes, and Christmas blend coffee. No, it's not rocket science, nor the cure for cancer... but it's something people get excited about.

This has been an English-only site, however this year Starbucks has versions of the site in eight languages (supporting the global company that Starbucks is).

While the "tradition keeper" host doesn't talk in each language (he's got subtitles) the online holiday activities ARE in each language. The activities currently include a) sending a message to a friend and b) posting a holiday traditions of your own. (I'm assuming there will be more to the site as the season progresses).

References
[1] - Starbucks: TheRedCup.com - Here I talk about the launch of the Starbucks Red Cup website
[2] - Starbucks, Christmastime, and the Red Cup - Here I tell the story about the time when I was marketing lead for the Christmas promotion and there was a last minute switch from the traditional red cup to keeping it white... madness ensued.
[3] - TheRedCup.com - Airport Pickup - I discuss a clever animated short about picking up the wrong relative at the airport. (Sorry the animation no longer works as there is no TheRedCup.com site any longer).

Sandboxes

October 12, 2006

Starbucks

Coffee Choices: What Is Too Much?

Starbucks has been criticized for excessiveness and offering 'too many options' in their drink offerings. It's been calculated that Starbucks can prepare between 19,000 and 55,000 different combinations of beverages... I ranted about this in a recent post....

But wait a minute...

Vend-o-Coffee.jpg

Take a look at this vending machine in Italy at the Pisa airport. Pisa's airport is small... Small as in you walk across the tarmac to get to/from your plane...

So... what's a teeny airport doing with a vending machine that serves 15 different coffee beverages?